Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 2 Next »

Questions

  • Would it make sense to remove this WP and move the budget and resources into the Partner Success and Core Chain WPs?

    • Does the steering committee think it is important to track this project and cares about the KPIs?

    • Technical support and QA for partners is done in the Partner Success WP

    • Partners require support for their API nodes which is in the Core Chain WP

    • Both the API and SDKs (and the associated documentation) are used by integrators. So, why have them in separate groups?

    • SDK features are closely tied to API features.

  • Other KPIs that would be helpful

KPIs

KPI

Summary

Next Steps

Integrator satisfaction

  • Created Integrator Survey

  • Review with Emily to create combined survey?

  • Sent to integrators

  • Review survey results and identify tasks to improve

FIO Data Services uptime

  • Cataloged services

  • Establish baseline target

  • Collect monthly data

SDK satisfaction

  • Added question to survey

  • Sent to integrators

  • Review survey results and identify tasks to improve

SDK feature coverage

Is this a meaningful KPI?

Survey

Integration Features (Filled out by FIO Team)

  • FIO Token support

  • FIO Send

  • FIO Crypto Handles

  • Crypto mapping and receiving

  • FIO Requests

  • NFT Signatures

  • Dashboard

Overall level of difficulty of integration

1 – Very difficult

2 – Difficult

3 – Neutral

4 – Easy

5 – Very easy

Recommended improvements:

Documentation (https://developers.fioprotocol.io)

1 – Poor

2 – Fair

3 – Good

4 – Very good

5 – Excellent

Recommended improvements:

Technical support

1 – Very dissatisfied

2 – Dissatisfied

3 – Unsure

4 – Satisfied

5 – Very satisfied

Recommended improvements:

SDK

1 – Poor

2 – Fair

3 – Good

4 – Very good

5 – Excellent

Recommended improvements:

Integrator satisfaction

Question

Integrator 1

Integrator 2

Integrator 2

Integration Features

Overall level of difficulty of integration

(1 – Very difficult, 2 – Difficult, 3 – Neutral, 4 – Easy, 5 – Very easy)

Documentation

(1 – Poor, 2 – Fair, 3 – Good, 4 – Very good, 5 – Excellent)

Technical support

(1 – Very dissatisfied, 2 – Dissatisfied, 3 – Unsure, 4 – Satisfied, 5 – Very satisfied)

SDK

(1 – Poor, 2 – Fair, 3 – Good, 4 – Very good, 5 – Excellent)

  • No labels