...
similar architecture to
addaddress
remallnfts
works as spec'dVector can be emptied in single call without iterating through all the objects. This allows for remallnfts to work flawlessly
Allows transfer address and burnaddress to work as spec’d
Cons:
Limit on number of NFTs that can be mapped
Requires limit on number of NFTs that can be mapped to any single FIO Address due to vector search linear compute time on checking existing entries and checking for items to remove. Like addpubaddress vector but more limited since it iterates with a larger object
Requires update to support
get_nfts_hash
Can’t do it unless all the data is duplicated in another table mapped by sha256 (fioaddress+chaincode+contractaddress+tokenid => hash)
If mapped, we would need an admin cleanup task these cannot be deleted with all vector entries w/ remallnfts, back to square one.
Does this support
get_nfts_contract
?
Solution 2. Multi-index container
...
Unlimited NFTs due to use of multi index container
Good search time adding/removing small entries
Supports
get_nfts_hash
Cons:
Cannot automatically remove all nftsNFTs.
Can do 5 at a time, newest to oldest or vice versa
By making
remallnfts
have less custom error responses and removing some other checks I may be able to salvage enough cpu time to clean out more NFTs in a single call.
Cannot Updates required to remove NFTs for a FIOAddress FIO Address in
Recommend solution 1 andxferaddress
or ,burnaddress
, andburnexpired
.get_nfts_hash
endpoint removed andget_nfts_contract
used alternativelyFor
xferaddress
, users would need to empty their NFTs using multiple calls to remallnfts first before they can transferTransfer the address immediately
Enter the Address into the
burnnfts
queue.This blocks the adding of new NFTs to the Address.
Block addition of new NFTs for that FIO Address as long as it is in the
burnnfts
queue
For
burnaddress
Proceed with burn as currently spec’d (burn the Address immediately).
Enter the Address into the
burnnfts
queue.This blocks the adding of new NFTs to the Address.
A new user can re-register the address, but if they attempt to add an NFT they would be blocked until the Address is cleared from the
burnnfts
queue.
For
burnexpired
, we would need to iterate through the burning of NFTS for every FIO Address that is getting burnedBurnexpired
could skip fioaddresses that have NFTs mapped and come back to those at the end if we wanted to optimize burn.
Discussion
Proceed with burnexpired as currently spec’d (burn all Addresses even if they have mapped NFTS)
Enter the address into the
burnnfts
queue if there are NFTs.This blocks the adding of new NFTs to the Address.
A new user can re-register the address, but if they attempt to add an NFT they would be blocked until the Address is cleared from the
burnnfts
queue.
TBD:
Need to spec out the
burnnfts
table
Discussion
Based on discussion with Adam, Pawel, and Eric:
Proceed with Solution #2
Adam Androulidakis will spec out the NFT Signature updates required to accommodate the
burnnfts
queue. ( https://fioprotocol.atlassian.net/browse/BD-2839 )Adam Androulidakis spec out new
burnnfts
admin call ( https://fioprotocol.atlassian.net/browse/BD-2843 )Casey Gardiner will spec out any updates to
burnexpired
(Also tracked in https://fioprotocol.atlassian.net/browse/BD-2843 )