...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
Discuss fee distribution implementation with Pawel
...
Add new error responses and get discuss with Pawel
...
Add remaining questions and review with Pawel (or team?)
...
Discuss Oracle RAM question with Pawel
...
Update FIP with all decisions
Questions for FIP-17
Misc. Requirements
Questions | Answers | |
|---|---|---|
Is there a minimum amount of FIO for wrapping or unwrapping? |
| |
Is there a maximum? |
| |
Should there be wrapping API custom endpoints? | BPs: Is there an easy way to go from FIO to Eth? |
|
TBD: Fees
Should we make fee table more flexible, similar to what we do for FIO endpoint fees?
TBD: Casey to propose and review with team.
TBD: Requirements: RAM
Why do we increase RAM on Oracle-specific actions (since they are BPs with unlimited RAM)? |
|
What should we set wrap RAM to? |
|
Requirement: Distributing Fees
...
Each action involving fees would need to iterate through the registered oracle's table and send their share of the oracle fee directly to them.
TBDDecision: Discussed with Pawel and decided we would use approach #2?
Table Structures
oracleledger
oracleledger keeps track of all wrapping transactions and logs the actor performing the request. This will be the same table used in both token and domain wrapping transactions.
TBD: ( type could be added in new iterations to allow for quick and simple index lookups based on status. )
...
Oracles
oracles tracks registered oracles used during the validation of unwrapping of NFT/tokens. This table also stores fee information used during the wrapping process.
...